Here you will find articles that don't fall into another category (or that I forgot to assign a category to), so look out you might find anything here!
Most people don’t understand the reasons for the racial division in this country, the rationale behind keeping the southern border open to allow a replacement population, or the push for gay and transgender agendas. They might think, ‘Wow, this seems like the work of someone who hates America and white people, and who is gay and married to… well, you can figure that out.
Makes sense now doesn’t it… Video from June 28, 2022
King James I of England and VI of Scotland was a staunch advocate of the Divine Right of Kings. He believed that his authority to rule was granted by God and, consequently, he was answerable only to divine judgment. This belief meant that, in his view, the king was not subject to the will of his people or any earthly constraints on his power.
James’s adherence to the Divine Right clashed significantly with the established axioms of English constitutionalism, which emphasized the supremacy of law and the parliament’s role in governance. Unlike in Scotland, where arbitrary jurisdictions were common, England had a long history of parliamentary supremacy and legal governance. James’s failure to grasp these principles led to numerous conflicts with the English Parliament, particularly when he tried to assert his divine authority over parliamentary privileges.
James’s belief in the Divine Right also influenced his financial policies. His reign saw a situation where the Crown’s expenditure exceeded its revenue, leading to a reliance on raising funds without Parliament’s consent. This situation reached a head with the introduction of a new “book of rates” to increase customs duties, a move that was contested but ultimately upheld by the courts as within the royal prerogative. This situation highlighted a constitutional danger, as it suggested that judicial decisions could be biased in favor of the Crown.
An attempt to resolve these financial and constitutional issues was made through the Great Contract, proposed by Cecil, Earl of Salisbury. This plan aimed to exchange the king’s technically valid claims for a fixed annual revenue. However, due to stiffening demands on both sides, the Great Contract fell through, leading to years of governmental operation without additional parliamentary supplies. This period included the convening of the “Addled Parliament,” which was dissolved without achieving anything.
King James I’s belief in the Divine Right of Kings significantly shaped his reign and his relationship with the English Parliament. His failure to adapt to the English system of constitutional governance led to numerous conflicts and legal challenges. His reign illustrates the tension between absolute monarchical power and the evolving principles of constitutional governance that were becoming increasingly entrenched in England.
For more in-depth information, the primary sources used in this analysis can be accessed:
In this speech, King James I famously expounded upon the theory of the divine right of kings. This doctrine held that a monarch derives his right to rule directly from the will of God and not from any consent of his subjects. The king is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate in the realm. It implies that only God can judge an earthly ruler and that any attempt to depose, dethrone, or restrict the powers of the king is contrary to the will of God.
In his speech, James I expressed his views on monarchy, governance, and the state, emphasizing his belief that kings are God’s lieutenants on earth and are thus accountable only to God. He asserted that kings have a divine right to govern and that their authority is not subject to the laws of the land or the will of their subjects.
From a young age, King James I exhibited close relationships with several male favorites. These relationships, notably with Robert Carr and George Villiers, were marked by passionate expressions of love and shared intimacies. For instance, James often shared his bed with his favorites, a practice not unusual in the 17th-century context but one that has fueled modern speculation.
While some historians, including Antonia Fraser, suggest that the relationships were likely sexual, others argue that they must be understood within the context of 17th-century masculinity, which differed significantly from today’s understandings.
Interestingly, King James publicly condemned sodomy. In his writings, he described it as a “horrible crime,” which contrasts sharply with the affection he showed towards his male favorites. This contradiction was noted by 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who labeled James a hypocrite for his harsh stance against sodomy.
The influence of James’s favorites on politics and their acquisition of wealth and power were major issues during his reign. The extent of the sexual nature of these relationships remains a matter of speculation, but it’s important to note that the political implications of these relationships were of far greater contemporary concern than the nature of his personal life.
James’s marriage to Anne of Denmark was marked by affection, estrangement, and eventual separation. They had eight children together, indicating a functional marital relationship despite the challenges and speculations about James’s sexual orientation. Rumors about James’s homosexuality and the nature of his marriage to Anne circulated during their lifetime, contributing to the complex picture of his personal life.
The question of King James I’s sexuality remains a topic more of academic interest than of definitive historical conclusion. It highlights the challenges in applying modern categories of sexuality to historical figures and underscores the need to understand historical personalities within their own cultural and temporal contexts.
For a more detailed exploration, you can refer to the primary source of this analysis, the Wikipedia article on the Personal relationships of James VI and I.
King James I, known for uniting the crowns of England and Scotland, is a significant historical figure whose lineage directly connects to the current British royal family. Here’s a detailed look at this connection:
The significance of James I extends beyond his personal reign; his descendants have shaped the course of British history. His role in uniting the kingdoms of England and Scotland laid the foundations for the modern United Kingdom. The transition from the Stuart dynasty to the House of Hanover and eventually to the House of Windsor illustrates the complex and evolving nature of British monarchy. Each subsequent monarch has carried forward a part of James I’s legacy, contributing to the rich tapestry of British history.
James I’s connection to the current royal family underscores the deep historical roots of the British monarchy. It illustrates how dynastic changes over centuries have shaped the institution, reflecting political, religious, and social transformations within the United Kingdom.
For a more comprehensive understanding of the British royal family’s lineage from James I to the present, the detailed family tree on Wikipedia provides a visual representation of these connections (Family tree of British monarchs).
King James I of England, also known as James VI of Scotland, ascended to the English throne in 1603. His reign is particularly noted for the commissioning of the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, a monumental event in the history of Christianity and English literature. To understand why King James embarked on this ambitious project, it’s essential to consider the religious and political context of the era.
The early 17th century was a time of significant religious conflict and turmoil. The Protestant Reformation had firmly established itself in parts of Europe, including England, leading to tensions between Protestant and Catholic factions. In England, the Elizabethan Religious Settlement had established the Church of England as a compromise between Catholic and Protestant practices. However, this settlement did not satisfy all factions.
Upon ascending the throne, King James was faced with a religious landscape marked by division. The existing English translations of the Bible, most notably the Geneva Bible, were associated with Protestant sectarianism and were seen as politically controversial due to the marginal notes that were critical of monarchical rule. The Bishops’ Bible, another version in use at the time, was considered to be of poor quality.
The decision to commission a new translation of the Bible was taken at the Hampton Court Conference in 1604. This conference was convened by King James to address various issues raised by the Puritans, a group seeking further reform of the Church of England. While the conference rejected most of the Puritans’ requests, the idea of a new Bible translation found favor with the king.
King James had several objectives for this new translation:
The King James Bible, completed in 1611, has had a profound impact on English-speaking Christianity and the English language. Its majestic prose and poetic beauty have made it a literary masterpiece, influencing countless writers and artists over the centuries. The KJV has also played a crucial role in shaping Christian worship and belief in the English-speaking world.
The translation of the King James Bible was a significant achievement of King James I’s reign. It was a strategic response to the religious and political challenges of the time, aiming to unite a divided nation under a single, authoritative version of the Bible. Its enduring legacy is a testament to the vision and influence of King James I.
The reign of King James I of England and VI of Scotland is a study in complexity and contradiction, marked by significant achievements and enduring controversies. From his speculated personal relationships to his firm belief in the Divine Right of Kings, and from his lineage’s connection to the current British royal family to his monumental commissioning of the King James Bible, his impact spans the realms of political, religious, and cultural history.
James’s reign was characterized by his efforts to unify his kingdoms, not only politically but also religiously. The King James Bible stands as a testament to his desire for a singular, unifying religious text, transcending sectarian divides and becoming one of the most influential works in the English language. His belief in the Divine Right of Kings, while causing friction with the English Parliament, highlights the historical evolution of monarchical power and its eventual transition towards constitutional monarchy.
The speculation regarding his personal life and relationships, though a subject of debate among historians, offers insight into the complexities of interpreting historical figures through a modern lens. Furthermore, his direct lineage to the current British royal family underscores the deep-rooted history and continuity of the British monarchy.
King James I’s legacy is a tapestry woven with threads of religious transformation, literary achievement, political theory, and personal intrigue. His reign, though centuries past, continues to resonate in modern discussions about governance, religion, and the interpretation of historical figures. It is a reminder of the multifaceted nature of history, where figures like King James I occupy a space that is both influential and enigmatic, leaving an indelible mark on the pages of time.
Operation Northwoods” was a proposed plan by the United States government in the early 1960s, during the height of the Cold War and specifically the tension with Cuba. This plan is now known due to declassified documents, revealing a shocking strategy that was never implemented.
The idea behind Operation Northwoods was to create a series of false-flag operations, which would appear as aggressive acts by Cuba against American targets. These operations included staging terrorist attacks in U.S. cities, hijacking planes, and even sinking boats filled with Cuban refugees. The goal of these actions was to create public outrage and fear, which would justify American military action against Cuba.
The plans were incredibly detailed, suggesting ways to create convincing scenarios that would make it seem like Cuba was attacking the United States. For instance, they proposed using remote-controlled drones to simulate Cuban aircraft shooting down an American plane. There were also plans to stage mock funerals for fake victims, adding to the illusion of Cuban aggression.
However, these plans were never put into action. They were presented to the Kennedy administration in 1962 by the Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff but were rejected by President John F. Kennedy. The existence of Operation Northwoods remained a secret for many years until the documents were declassified in the 1990s.
Operation Northwoods is now often cited as an example of how far governments might go in staging events to influence public opinion and justify military actions. It remains a controversial and eye-opening chapter in the history of U.S. military and intelligence operations.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident of 1964 is a pivotal moment in history, often identified as the event that escalated the Vietnam War. This incident involved two reported confrontations between the United States and North Vietnam in the Gulf of Tonkin, but subsequent revelations have cast doubt on the veracity of these reports.
On August 2, 1964, the USS Maddox, a U.S. Navy destroyer, was conducting a signals intelligence patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin. It was initially reported that the Maddox was attacked by North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats, leading to an exchange of gunfire. However, declassified documents and historical analysis later revealed that this attack did not actually occur. The Maddox was actually engaged in covert operations, supporting South Vietnamese attacks on North Vietnamese islands, a fact not widely known at the time.
Two days later, on August 4, there was a second reported incident involving the Maddox and another destroyer, the USS Turner Joy. They claimed to have been attacked again by North Vietnamese forces. These reports were also later called into question, with evidence suggesting that the August 4 incident may have been misinterpreted or exaggerated.
Despite the questionable nature of these incidents, the U.S. response was immediate and forceful. President Lyndon B. Johnson ordered retaliatory air strikes against North Vietnamese targets and sought congressional approval for further military action. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed on August 7, 1964, granted President Johnson the authority to increase U.S. military presence in Vietnam without a formal declaration of war.
This event marked a significant escalation in U.S. involvement in Vietnam, leading to a long and costly conflict. The Gulf of Tonkin incident, especially in light of later revelations about its inaccuracy, has become a symbol of the potential consequences of misinformation and the misrepresentation of events in shaping foreign policy. It remains a controversial and critical subject in the study of American history and foreign relations.
Check out my latest video where I dive into my predictions for 2024. From a major economic downturn to rising global conflicts and potential wars, I cover it all. This is a crucial watch for anyone wanting to stay ahead and prepare for what the future might hold. Don’t miss out on these eye-opening insights – click the link to watch now and discover what 2024 could have in store for us. Stay informed, stay prepared!
Thank you,
M.D. Creekmore
If you need long-term storage foods and prepping supplies then checkout my recommendation on this page.
Welcome to the ultimate destination for anyone invested in preparedness and self-sufficiency. M.D. Creekmore’s “Ultimate Prepper’s Knowledge Hub” is an extensive resource that offers over 395 articles on various topics like prepping, homesteading, bushcraft, and survival. Whether you are a seasoned survivalist, a passionate homesteader, or just starting your journey in preparedness, this hub has something to enrich your knowledge and skills.
The hub is meticulously curated to ensure a comprehensive guide that educates and inspires. Each article is thoughtfully crafted, echoing our mission to prepare you for any scenario. This vast collection is not just a compilation of techniques and tips; it’s a testament to the art of self-reliance and the resilience of the human spirit.
Our range of topics is diverse and in-depth. From practical advice on how to prepare your home for emergency scenarios to the intricacies of bushcraft, each piece of content is a step towards self-reliance. The articles delve into the nuances of homesteading, offering guidance on how to transform your living space into a self-sustaining ecosystem. For the preppers, there are numerous pieces on survival strategies and skills, ensuring you’re ready for any challenge that comes your way.
One of the unique aspects of the Knowledge Hub is its accessibility. Designed to be user-friendly, it allows you to explore at your own pace, absorb information, and apply it practically. It’s not just about reading; it’s about learning, experiencing, and growing in your journey towards preparedness.
In this digital era, where information is abundant yet fragmented, the Ultimate Prepper’s Knowledge Hub stands out as a singular, reliable source for those who seek to be prepared. It’s a community, a learning platform, and a beacon of knowledge in the ever-evolving world of self-sufficiency and preparedness.
Join us on this enlightening journey. Embrace the wisdom, share your experiences, and become a part of a community that values preparedness and resilience. The road to self-reliance is an exciting one, and the Ultimate Prepper’s Knowledge Hub is here to guide you every step of the way.
The escalating conflict between Israel and Hamas in the Middle East is more than a distant issue; it’s a potential trigger for unrest and division worldwide, including possible terrorist attacks in the U.S. In my latest video, I discuss how such international tensions could lead to calls for increased security measures, possibly even martial law, by the federal government. I draw parallels with the post-9/11 era, highlighting how events like these have historically led to significant changes in government policies and actions. Understanding the “Order out of Chaos” strategy, used by governments to gain control during turbulent times, is crucial for everyone, especially preppers.
Recently, I’ve encountered a surprising issue with YouTube: my 70-year-old mother, who was not only a subscriber but also a moderator on my channel, has been mysteriously unsubscribed again! She noticed this a few days ago and found that her moderator status was removed as well. This isn’t the first time it’s happened to her, and it’s clear evidence that YouTube is unsubscribing people without their consent or notification. This incident has made me wonder if this is happening to others as well.
I’m reaching out to ask for your help. Could you please take a moment to click on the link and check if you’re still subscribed to my channel? Your support means a lot, and ensuring you’re still connected will help us stay in touch and keep the community strong. Thank you so much for your continued support and for being a part of our journey. Every subscriber is important to us, and we want to make sure no one is unintentionally left out.
Many people believe that Alex Jones was de-platformed and faced billion-dollar lawsuits due to his controversial statements about the Sandy Hook School incident. But is that the complete story? I have a different perspective on why these drastic actions were taken against him. In this video, I’ll dive into the details that are often overlooked and present my viewpoint on the real reasons behind Alex Jones’ situation. Do you agree with the common narrative, or do you think there’s more to it? Watch the video and share your thoughts in the comments. Let’s explore this together and uncover the truth.
A video with too much truth for YouTube.
Total Estimated Cost: $900 – $1,275
And don’t forget to checkout all of my favorite gear here!